Talk:Overturn Demon Lord, Asmodai/@comment-34817248-20180228092105/@comment-28173866-20180228154605

That phrasing is really really poor. Even "declared against" is still not fully clear, since shields are declared against the attack and not the Overturn.

About the timing, i'm absolutely not sure about it, but wouldn't it be: attack declaration, cast shield, activate overturn and since overturn is resolved first, the shield would still activate?

I accept it might be a loophole due to the bad phrasing, but can't we agree on an unoffical rule, that you are allowed to use counter, as long as the overturn isn't affected? Everything else would not only be unreasonable, but also unfair (even against other Overturn cards, which can't be activated during the attack phase). I mean, would you guys really want a Corps Leader with an uncounterable attack?