Talk:Tsukikage & Byakuya, "Chaotic Nano Art of Body Duplication!"/@comment-26290163-20160412055609/@comment-26290163-20160414004235

Agreed. They'd either need to place it on the card as with Super Lethal Formation, in the Q&A, or reply with corroboration from a similar situation before I'd let it go, or advise it.

They know my project, that I judge locally and am working on tutorials and are very supportive of it, giving me a lot of in depth explanations. Back when Byakuya "SD" came out, I asked if he would gain 1 Critical for each Tsukikage on the field. Some had thought that it would be a given, and I was hoping for it as I saw no specific contextual restraints. However, in correspondence I found out that his ability would not be aggregate. It was contextually based and cards where that is allowed use different language. I think that the rules should show that while there are 3 'named' types, act, auto and continuous, they should make it clear that there are other types of abilities in the same sentence, like conditional abilities, etc... As it is now, context based abilities are mentioned in a different section. Personally, I'd rather they mark them like with (Act) and am not sure why they don't.

A big revelation hit me when working on abilities with them and I found out that none of the Secret Swords (Absolute is a bit different) were Any of the 3 named abilities. It changed the way I studied correspondence, Q&A's and the Detailed rules on both sites. I ended up doing a contest for whoever could figure out what type of abilities they were. Kota ended up figuring it out, but very knowledgable players were in the Auto dept or another 'named' one.

It's probably too early for them to tell me, si if they can't, I'll keep hoping and wait for it to be released in Japan and look at the Q&A's. They're handling those better. Especially when Impact Monsters were released.