User blog comment:SaiScott95/SaiScott95's Armorknight Deck (Danger World)/@comment-203.219.214.245-20140130073039/@comment-1755882-20140131203048

Nah, I'd wager Tournaments are an even worse argument for the quality of cards and decks, since the average person's testing, while usually far insufficient for accounting for luck and other factors, will still be better than a single tournament due to the time restraints of a tournament. The only way to really get any conclusive and solid evidence is for people to do extremely expansive testing. I've been attempting to do that, but simply haven't had the time on my hands. For reference, when I say expansive testing, I mean AT LEAST 128 Games (which is how much you need, at least, to even begin to properly account for luck) of testing while controlling for player skill and recording the games in some method so that you can check for any anomalies.