Talk:Jet Black Grim Reaper, Gaito/@comment-43897300-20190929051057/@comment-26684750-20191008055945

No one will confirm it, since it's wrong.

As people have said, this will only activate from its own effect.

Your reasoning is faulty. Just because it's a different sentence doesn't mean it's not the same effect. It is still dependent on the first sentence. Conditional sentences exist (with a dependent one and an independent one).

Proof that it is a dependent sentence is due to the conditional clause. It says "If you destroyed a monster, ". It uses "if" and the past tense, meaning that it is specific to something previous to it, and not applicable to a general situation.

Almost every non-dependent condition in the game uses "when" and the present tense to signify that it applies to general conditions (See O-Yami, Billion Impact, etc.). Only very few use the past tense, and none of them use "if" as part of the dependent condition.

There are examples of cards that have both. ie, DD Barrett which uses "when" in its first, general condition ("When an