User blog comment:AmazingPST"Providence"/You're the Omni Lord!/@comment-6171008-20150809112132/@comment-24971427-20150810121511

First of all, don't give me stupid reasons. It's like when my friend made that horrible impact that gives you practically infinite life and deals 10 damage to your opponent with a bunch of other stupid nonsense for only 3 gauge. Why is it overpowered? "Oh, you see, 3 gauge is kinda hard to pay. So it's actually really balanced."

Besides, if you use that arguement about your opponent playing around this card's first ability, I could say the same for Genjuro. Very restrictive, allowing you to only reduce Magic World Spells by 1 gauge. I mean, not having to pay 1 gauge isn't a lot, it doesn't increase my gauge either, couldn't it just let me cast spells for free? and losing 5000 in the process? Please. It has 2000 Defense, easily retired as well. Only being able to use it on Magic World spells just sucks, it forces you to use spells as a bigger part of a Magic World deck than it already is, and the spells you run will probably have more of a cost than usual. What if I wanted to cast Buddy Help? That would just be stupid wouldn't it? How, pray tell, is this card worth to run in your deck if your opponent still has ways to get rid of it. It just forces you to play it differently then you would have. >.>

The math is there though, I read this card over again and found that its first ability isn't even restricted to any world. 5000 for yourself to reduce cast costs by 1 gauge for only Magic World spells is already costly. For your opponent's spells not even caring about which world they are from and increasing all of that, it's at the very least taking 7000 away from stats. Then making your opponent pay 1 gauge for every set spell they have on the field, and if they don't pay, they have to send them all to the drop zone? Once again, at the very least, it should take away 3000.

You have 10000 in debt now. Minus 2000 Defense and a gauge cost which is worth 2000, you still have 6000 left in debt. You should find a way to make this card more fair.

(This whole comment is full of sarcasm except for the third paragraph. No one else respond to the sarcastic parts.)