User blog comment:Drago0661/Jack Bond - My Jackknife Deck/@comment-10483040-20140617131223/@comment-4844839-20140619045432

"...gambits in chess are only the opening."

I was obviously not talking about the naming thing. I was talking about gambit's basic ideology, which is to sacrifice one's chess piece(s) in order to gain another form of advantage.

Cmon, Blaz. You're better than that, I assume? I didn't want to get started on you, but while I'm at it, I already read your blog articles and to be honest, it didn't help a lot. While I quite agree about your theory of value (1 card = 2 gauge = 2 health), for the rest of the stuff you were only stating obvious things with maths. Like on the first turn you should not spam call your monsters (well, duh) or calling monsters to your field is not a minus (double duh). To be even more honest, I think Hunter's recent point is more interesting than yours.

You may write about card analysis and stuff, I won't bother you. Just don't barge in our discussion and point that everyone else is wrong.