Talk:Hundred Demons General, Iyonorasetsuryu/@comment-26831566-20150802004716/@comment-24971427-20150811090020

Against opponent with Closed Centers.

Tenbu *Destroys 3 monsters once it enters the field.*

Inferno *Destroys 0-1 monster when entering the field.* *Destroys 1 monster by emptying two souls*

Tenbu can still attack. You can also leave your center open to attack with an item.

Inferno can still attack. You can also leave your center open to attack with an item.

Against opponent with open centers.

Tenbu *Destroys 2 monsters once it enters the field*

Inferno *Destroys 0-1 monster when entering the field.* *Destroys 1 monster by emptying two souls*

Tenbu can still attack. You can also leave your center open to attack with an item.

Inferno can still attack. You can also leave your center open to attack with an item.

It's basically the same. Tenbu can always guarantee to destroy 2 monsters on the field. Inferno can do the same, but there's also a chance you might not get an Armordragon into its soul, so it only destroys 1 monster. Inferno has another 1000 Power and Defense. That's it.

It's almost the same! I prefer being able to get what I want instead of betting on a game of chance. So I don't run cards like Brave, Drum, nor Inferno Armor Dragon.

When Tenbu enters the field. 2 monsters is guaranteed to get destroyed.

When Inferno enters the field. 1 monster is guaranteed to get destroyed. Their difference is 1000 Power and Defense and the fact that Inferno will only sometimes destroy 2 monsters annoy me. That 1000 difference in power and defense doesn't matter to me.