Thread:TyrantRex/@comment-11372432-20140926013632/@comment-11454852-20140930144441

Agreed, commotion appears to always start when the selections begin, so let's just give the final list of candidates. Like Future said Chat here should be different from the CFV one since it has a different set of rules so Mods should probably be different, anyways, the candidates based on what I have seen so far are: Will point out one thing, being liked or not is a factor true, but "can do the job" is more important. An example: I've had several teachers who were liked by everyone but were bad at teaching, and others who no one liked but did a good job at teaching, IMO those were better to have. Similar can/should be applied, we also have to acknowledge everyone has done one or more mistakes before (PERFECTION DOESN'T EXIST AND IS A BAD THING PEOPLE!).
 * Future: Has experience with it and is known to know how to contribute and organize project when needed, was admin candidate by recomendation twice.
 * Kota: Previously been admin candidate also by recomendation and based on several witnesses can take the position seriously.
 * Anonymous: Had private talks with several admins where he showed that can be serious and mature about this and can take the position. For security and respect will be kept secret until the votation which will be for admins only.
 * Sorin/Eugene/Chad: Mod experience, according to several sources not the best liked but can do the job.
 * Iffy: Mod Experience, based on a quick look trhough contributions (did the same for everyone) can handle situations and also knows how to take action when needed.
 * AbsoluteZeroD: Suggested to be a good candidate, but my concern is that he has very few contributions.
 * Shadeax: Recomended by at least 3 different users.
 * Gallatin: A few controvertial incidents aside should at least be given a chance.