Talk:Demonic Dragon of Demise, Azi Dahaka/@comment-2234004-20150110175137/@comment-24965906-20150111131246

Seeing as I now saw your post and picture (thanks to being busy/asleep for the past hours), and that I didn't just outright rudely ignore your contribution to the discussion as you implied I did as I had no idea it even existed, I did not see it. (And I did see the post with Nubatama Ninja just as a further note).

In this light, I honestly would say that to wait on the official ruling. But...

Saying a Size 4 is the same as a Size 3+1 is not exactly true, even as a technicality, as Size 3+1 is a case of two different monsters (in the case of your Gold Ritter ruling, a monster and a 'monster') co-existing on the field once the latter Size is added, while Azi Dahaka is a singular monster entering the field.

I can see why I would be wrong by your logic, but these are still inconsistencies that should be cleared. Again, even if I was wrong, I'll just say wait for official ruling. I am not going to continue on posting what I believe on this matter is the truth, or as you refer it as, 'spouting', as this topic now raises questions that haven't been exactly examined before.

I'm sorry if I had offended anyone, somehow.

@Giraton - The last monster called meant the last monster called by that player (or maybe by either player...hmm...), period. It does not mean that the title ends after that resolution check, so it had stood to reason that Azi would have survived other resolution checks based on that ruling, because as far as the field goes, Azi Dahaka is still the last monster called, which does spare it from the resolution.

(Well, maybe until another monster is called by another player if the side note is correct).