Talk:Archangel Dragon, Gavriel/@comment-25542469-20181215012053/@comment-25542469-20181215023642

@Future: If that's the case, then I suppose it's fine. If not... well, I don't really know.

Note: The main issue I have with the dragon-name is that it isn't needed. Outside of Bushi's seeming obsession with dragons, this would be perfectly fine as just an angel. If Bushi wants to add a few more dragons to LW, I'm fine with that. Heck, adding the ones from mythology could be fun. However, the dragon attribute shouldn't be a primary thing. It should simply be a secondary, fun attribute while the actual card is support for another attribute, such as the Wydar dragons. If they really wanted this to be a dragon, he didn't need it to be his attribute, he simply could have been an angel, had dragon in his name, and then, maybe, had (white) dragon as a secondary attribute. There, done, he's an angel dragon, and we don't have yet another dragon attribute in a world that doesn't need one.