User blog comment:Tagion/ (Help!) BF Deck Improvement Program/@comment-27276068-20150108192039/@comment-25426535-20150110200755

Yeah, sorry. This was the second thing I did to my real life Asgard deck (before tearing it apart to make the "good enough" wydar sarkals) after realising how weak and inconsistant a ragnorok/gleipnir deck seemed (granted, it was bt04 only, with some generics from times long past). And somehow, when my friend proxied an asgard deck including unreleased cards, he pulled off Ragnorok on the first turn twice in a row, but I realise that was just a fluke and his amazing luck. So I just gave advice based on what I did (with all the promos and unreleased cards included, as he some of those in his deck already).

On keeping a one of Fimbulwinter, or any Fimbulwinters in a Ragnorok free deck, Fimbulwinter forces you to sacrafice a card, temporarily. It will reduce your options for a couple turns as you'll have one less card, reducing your decks consistency and your ability to deal with situations.

And I only advised to remove Loki because of deck space concerns. It seems that I suggested adding more cards than I suggested removing. As I suggested removing Fimbulwinter, Loki would have lost a way to guarantee his usefulness.