Talk:Yearner of Extinction, Azi Dahaka/@comment-16118869-20160412035023/@comment-3974145-20160412044303

Okay I will put it simply;

Erasure of History = 3 damage and all Monsters on Field gone + Item all in one single attack.

DA + Penetrate = 2 damage in two seperate attacks, and maybe 1 monster gone.

Erasure of History can be stopped by one Null card, DA can be stopped by 2. [This point though is entirely rhetorical to make since it has nothing to do with being more Aggro :/]

If anything I would want to stop that 3 damage and field wipe more then those measly 2 damage attacks. Considering 3 damage or more is damaging, 2 damage or less is not. DA doesn't change the fact that it's only 2 damage. If anything your only going to waste one shield still because 2 damage is nothing to cry over unless you only have 2 life left.

So yea, I'm sorry to all you people but I just see Original Azi's Erasure of History being the more Aggro move cause it is pure destruction incarnate, while this... is just DA with 2 damage... nothing we've never seen before :/