User blog comment:Bnoah23/Deck Opinions/@comment-6102960-20150322115729

I was going to comment and give you some tips....then I see how you react to Kaiser.

Kaiser is right. These decks need a lot of reworking. Fun decks or not, if they don't function, it is a bad deck. The Asgard deck for example, you're including a single copy of Gleipnir, in a deck with just one Size 3 card. And only 1 Rune Staff as well. That's really dumb.

And I also see that you seem to think that a "Drum Deck" needs to have all copies of Drum, or many variations of him. This is wong. Tyhe reason that deck is really REALLY bad, is because you have Blue Sky Knights AND Thunder Knights Drum in the same deck, and no other of the respective archetype/monsters that are the same as them. You'll end up paying 1 gauge to get a Soul-less Drum. I understand using Dual Wield, but...not like this.

When I look at your Dragon Lord /Duel Sieger deck, I legit get annoyed. What are you trying to accomplish with that deck when you are only running 2 copies of each Sieger form? You're not running Divine Dragon Creation, you¨re not running Rise and Fall of Dragons, you¨re using Dragonlution instead of Dragon Outlaw....

I want to believe these are the cards you have at hand, and the only decks you can build...but then I see a lot of unreleased cards too, so that excuse is invalid. When you posty something like this, you need to understand you will be criticized. And I'll be critical and say that these decks, even as "fun decks", are really bad.....